1. Analyse India’s decision to upgrade its Kabul mission to a full-fledged embassy. Discuss its implications for India’s strategic, security, and diplomatic engagement in West and Central Asia.
Syllabus: General Studies – II: India and its Neighborhood- Relations |
IN NEWS: Indian Embassy in Kabul will help ‘regional peace’: Taliban spokesman
India’s decision to upgrade its Technical Mission in Kabul into a full-fledged embassy signifies a strategic recalibration of its Afghanistan policy—balancing engagement, security, and regional influence amid shifting geopolitical realities.
1. Strategic Dimension: Maintaining Geopolitical Relevance
- Re-engagement ensures India’s presence in Afghanistan’s evolving power matrix dominated by Pakistan, China, and regional actors like Iran, Russia, and Qatar.
- It allows New Delhi to retain diplomatic leverage in a region central to its “extended neighbourhood” policy.
- Counters Beijing’s Belt and Road outreach and Islamabad’s deepening link with the Taliban regime.
2. Security and Counterterrorism Dimension
- A full mission enables better intelligence gathering against terror groups such as LeT, JeM, and IS-K operating from Afghan soil.
- Prevents a repeat of pre-2001 security vulnerabilities when India lacked on-ground presence.
- Strengthens coordination with regional partners on counter-radicalization and border security.
3. Developmental and Humanitarian Dimension
- Institutionalizes ongoing aid efforts—food, medicines, vaccines, and infrastructure repair.
- Reinforces India’s long-term development legacy (Salma Dam, Parliament building, Zaranj-Delaram highway).
- Positions India as a people-centric actor, distinct from geopolitical interventions.
4. Diplomatic and Normative Dimension
- Reflects India’s shift from isolation to “engagement without endorsement”, avoiding formal recognition while ensuring dialogue.
- Strengthens India’s credibility as a pragmatic regional player willing to engage all stakeholders.
- Enhances communication channels to influence Taliban conduct on human rights, minorities, and women’s education.
5. Economic and Connectivity Dimension
- Facilitates resumption of trade via Chabahar Port and air-corridor routes for Afghan goods.
- Supports India’s Central Asia outreach through the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC).
- Creates space for future energy and infrastructure cooperation once internal stability improves.
6. Multilateral and Regional Stability Dimension
- Complements India’s role in UN-led humanitarian mechanisms and the SCO-Afghanistan Contact Group.
- Encourages regional dialogue for a stable, inclusive Afghan polity.
- Promotes peace-building efforts vital for India’s own internal security and regional balance.
India’s diplomatic upgrade in Kabul is not mere symbolism—it is a calculated act of strategic realism. By engaging the Taliban cautiously, New Delhi secures its interests, upholds its development commitments, and reasserts itself as a key architect of stability in post-conflict Afghanistan and the wider Eurasian region.
PYQ REFERENCE (UPSC 2013) Q. The proposed withdrawal of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) from Afghanistan in 2014 is fraught with major security implications for the countries of the region. Examine in light of the fact that India is faced with a plethora of challenges and needs to safeguard its own strategic interests. (150 WORDS) |
2. Critically examine the Supreme Court Collegium’s decision to modify judicial transfer recommendations in line with alleged executive preferences. Discuss its implications for judicial independence and the transparency of the Collegium system.
Syllabus: General Studies – II: Separation of Powers (between different organs, dispute redressal mechanisms, institutions) Judiciary (structure, organisation functioning) |
IN NEWS: SC Collegium’s shift in Justice Sreedharan’s posting triggers judicial independence concerns
The Supreme Court Collegium’s recent decision to transfer Justice Atul Sreedharan to the Allahabad High Court, reportedly aligning with the government’s preference, has once again highlighted concerns over executive interference, judicial independence, and the functioning of the Collegium system.
1. Undermining Judicial Independence
- Executive influence in transfers threatens the judiciary’s autonomy, a core principle of separation of powers.
- Judges may feel constrained in politically sensitive cases, affecting impartiality and constitutional checks.
- Justice Sreedharan’s past involvement in sensitive rulings underlines the stakes in preserving judicial freedom.
2. Erosion of Collegium Transparency
- The Collegium’s decision lacked reasoned explanation, reflecting opacity in appointments and transfers.
- Absence of public rationale undermines accountability and can erode public trust in the judiciary.
3. Pattern of Executive Interference
- Historical examples, such as Justice Akil Kureshi’s curtailed elevation in 2018, indicate government influence shaping judicial careers.
- Such patterns compromise the credibility and autonomy of the Collegium system.
4. Impact on Judicial Functioning and Morale
- Arbitrary or politically influenced transfers can affect judicial morale and decision-making, particularly in sensitive cases.
- It risks creating a culture of self-censorship among judges, weakening the judiciary’s role as a constitutional safeguard.
5. Need for Systemic Reform
- A transparent, structured, and consultative framework for transfers and appointments is essential.
Mechanisms for reasoned communication and institutional accountability within the Collegium can balance judicial primacy with oversight.
The Justice Sreedharan case underscores the tension between executive influence and judicial autonomy. Strengthening transparency, ensuring institutional safeguards, and maintaining principled collegium procedures are crucial to protect judicial independence, uphold rule of law, and preserve public confidence in the judiciary.
PYQ REFERENCE (UPSC 2020) Q. Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities (150 WORDS) |