Contributions of Moral Thinkers and Philosophers from India and World
In News:The harm principle: how John Mill’s theory defines the extent of liberty
Analyse John Mill’s theory of liberty in the Indian context.
John Stuart Mill’s theory of liberty, as outlined in his seminal work “On Liberty,” is a cornerstone of liberal philosophy. It advocates for individual freedom as a fundamental human right, subject only to limitations necessary to prevent harm to others.
The only justification for limiting individual liberty is to prevent harm to others. This principle distinguishes between actions that directly affect others and those that primarily affect the individual. This is called the ‘harm principle’.
His theory is based on the principle that “If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.”
According to John Mill,
- Individuals should be free to pursue their own lives as they choose, provided they do not harm others.
- Individuals have the right to express their opinions and beliefs, even if they are controversial or unpopular.
- Individuals should be free to form their own beliefs and opinions without interference from the state or others.
- Individuals have the right to associate with others and form groups or organisations.
Mill’s theory and their relevance to India:
- The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights to its citizens, including freedom of speech, expression, religion, and association. There are certain exceptions to these rights to maintain public order, security, and morality. It is in line with Mill’s theory of liberty.
- Mill’s support for individual autonomy aligns with the push for social reforms in India aimed at improving the status of women, LGBTQ+ rights, and other marginalised groups.
- Mill warned that the majority could oppress the minority. This is especially relevant in India, where caste-based discrimination and social inequalities have marginalised certain groups. The Indian Constitution seeks to protect the rights of minorities and prevent the tyranny of the majority.
- Indian democracy values political debate and criticism. However, there are instances where political dissent is suppressed or restricted, especially in cases involving sedition laws or anti-terrorism legislation.
- Mill’s support for religious freedom aligns with India’s constitutional protections but is often tested by communal tensions and clashes. Balancing religious freedoms with societal harmony is essential to uphold Mill’s principle without leading to conflict or harm.
While Mill’s theory is useful in understanding individual liberties in India, India’s unique cultural, historical, and social contexts require a more nuanced analysis of individual freedoms, considering factors like caste, religion, gender, and economic inequality.
| PYQ : Analyse John Rawls’s concept of social justice in the Indian context.2016Max Weber said that it is not wise to apply to public administration the sort of moral and ethical norms we apply to matters of personal conscience. It is important to realise that the State bureaucracy might possess its own independent bureaucratic morality. Critically analyse this statement. 2016 |