1. The Forest Rights Act, 2006 was meant to safeguard tribal communities, yet large projects like the Great Nicobar development face challenges in its implementation. Discuss the key issues and the role of Union and UT administrations in ensuring compliance.
| Syllabus: General Studies – III: Conservation, Environmental Pollution and Degradation, Environmental Impact Assessment |
Key Issues in FRA Implementation
1. Procedural Gaps – In several cases, FRA processes such as recognition of rights and Gram Sabha consultations are not fully carried out.
Example: Nicobar Tribal Council alleged that the FRA process was never initiated despite official clearance.
2. Conflict with Development Goals – Large projects prioritise economic infrastructure over tribal rights and ecological concerns.
3. Ambiguity of Responsibilities – Different ministries pass responsibility, leading to accountability gaps.
4. Weak Role of Gram Sabhas – Tribal consent is often obtained in haste or manipulated.
5. Administrative Overreach – Certificates issued by officials without independent verification.
6. Judicial Scrutiny – Frequent legal challenges indicate weak compliance mechanisms.
Example: Calcutta HC petitions questioning FRA violations in Nicobar.
7. Marginalisation of Vulnerable Tribes – PVTGs like the Shompens face risk of displacement without meaningful consultation.
Role of Union and UT Administrations
1. Union Government – Must provide policy guidance, ensure FRA compliance is a prerequisite for clearances, and act as nodal authority for monitoring.
2. UT Administration – Responsible for actual implementation: recognition of rights, conducting Gram Sabhas, and submitting compliance reports transparently.
3. Coordination Needed – Better synergy between Environment Ministry, Tribal Affairs Ministry, and UT administration is essential to avoid jurisdictional conflicts.
The FRA, 2006 is a vital instrument of social justice and environmental governance. The Great Nicobar case underlines that mere procedural certification cannot replace genuine tribal participation and accountability. Strengthening institutional coordination, ensuring free, prior and informed consent, and independent monitoring are crucial for balancing development with ecological and social sustainability.
| PYQ REFERENCE [2017] Q. Not many years ago, river linking was a concept but it is becoming reality in the country. Discuss the advantages of river linking and its possible impact on the environment. [150 Words] [10 Marks] |
2) The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 increased reservation in jobs from 3% to 4%, yet their share in Union government posts is still below 1.2%. Has the Act ensured real empowerment and inclusion of persons with disabilities? Discuss.
| Syllabus: General Studies – II: Welfare Schemes for Vulnerable Sections of the population by the Centre and States and the Performance of these Schemes; Mechanisms, Laws, Institutions and Bodies constituted for the Protection and Betterment of these Vulnerable Sections |
The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPwD Act) expanded the definition of disability from 7 to 21 categories and enhanced job reservation from 3% to 4%. However, official data show that despite this progressive legislation, the share of persons with disabilities (PwDs) in Union government jobs has remained below 1.2%, highlighting gaps between law and implementation.
Advantages of the RPwD Act, 2016
1. Enhanced Reservation – Job reservation increased from 3% to 4%, with sub-quotas for specific disabilities.
Example: Ensures fairer representation for benchmark disabilities.
2. Wider Coverage – Expanded disability categories from 7 to 21, including autism, thalassemia, and acid attack victims.
3. Legal Safeguards – Provides for non-discrimination in employment, education, and access to government schemes.
4. Accessibility Mandate – Compulsory provisions for barrier-free infrastructure and digital access.
Example: Accessible India Campaign linked to the Act.
5. Grievance Redressal Mechanism – Appointment of chief commissioners and state commissioners for persons with disabilities.
6. Skill Development Support – Encourages vocational training and special employment exchanges.
7. Recognition of Dignity – Shifts from a charity/welfare model to empowerment and rights.
Why the Act has limitations in ensuring empowerment
1. Low Representation in Jobs: Despite 4% reservation, PwDs constitute only 1.15% of Union government staff in 2022
2. Concentration in Lower Posts: PwDs mostly employed in Group C posts (1.9%), while in Group A it is only 1%, reflecting lack of upward mobility.
3. Implementation Gaps: Ministries and departments often fail to conduct special recruitment drives or carry forward backlog vacancies.
4. Ambiguity in Merit vs Reservation: SC flagged issue: PwDs selected on merit often counted against reserved quota, reducing opportunities for others in the category.
5. Incomplete and Inconsistent Data: Since 2018, many ministries haven’t submitted complete disability employment data.
6. Lack of Accessibility in Workplaces: Physical, digital, and attitudinal barriers remain in offices despite the Act’s mandate.
Example: Accessible India Campaign has had limited success.
7. Social Stigma and Skill Gap: Negative perceptions, limited training, and lack of assistive technologies hinder real inclusion.
The RPwD Act, 2016 is a significant step toward legal empowerment, but its on-ground outcomes remain weak due to poor enforcement, limited awareness, and lack of monitoring. For true inclusion, India must ensure strict vacancy audits, workplace accessibility, skill development, and attitudinal change. Only then will the Act translate into real empowerment and dignity for persons with disabilities.
| PYQ REFERENCE [2017] Q. Does the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ensure effective mechanisms for empowerment and inclusion of the intended beneficiaries in the society? Discuss [150 Words] [10 Marks] |