1. “The Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA) plays a critical role in regulating foreign funding of NGOs in India. Critically examine the implications of the recent directive mandating NGOs to apply for renewal of FCRA registration at least four months before expiry, in the context of transparency, accountability, and civil society functioning.”
| Syllabus: General Studies – II: Government Policies and Interventions for Development in various sectors and Issues arising out of their Design and Implementation. Development Processes and the Development Industry — the Role of NGOs, SHGs, various groups and associations, donors, charities, institutional and other stakeholders. |
The FCRA, 2010 regulates foreign funding of NGOs to safeguard national security, transparency, and accountability. The Ministry of Home Affairs recently directed NGOs to submit renewal applications four months before expiry, citing delays in scrutiny and security clearances. While the step seeks to streamline compliance, it raises broader questions about state–civil society relations.
Positive Implications
- Enhanced Security Oversight – Gives intelligence and enforcement agencies more time to vet NGOs.
- Transparency & Accountability – Ensures timely monitoring of foreign funds’ utilisation.
- Administrative Efficiency – Reduces last-minute rush of applications, easing MHA’s workload.
- Continuity of Projects – NGOs know renewal status well in advance, avoiding sudden disruptions.
- Curbing Misuse of Funds – Prevents organisations under scrutiny from continuing operations unchecked.
Challenges for NGOs & Civil Society
- Administrative Burden – Small and rural NGOs lack capacity for complex compliance.
- Funding Disruptions – Delays in approvals can halt social welfare, health, and education projects.
- Shrinking Civic Space – Frequent tightening of FCRA may discourage independent voices.
- Unequal Impact – Well-resourced NGOs can comply, but grassroots organisations suffer most.
- Bureaucratic Delays – Risk of genuine NGOs being penalised due to procedural backlogs.
Broader Implications
- Developmental Impact – NGOs play a crucial role in supplementing state efforts in poverty reduction, women’s empowerment, and disaster relief.
- Rights-Based Work Affected – Advocacy NGOs working on environment, human rights, or tribal issues may face more scrutiny.
- Shift to Domestic Funding – May encourage CSR and local philanthropy, but India’s giving culture is still evolving.
- Trust Deficit – Creates a perception of over-regulation and mistrust between state and civil society.
Way Forward
- Balanced Regulation – Maintain security oversight without stifling legitimate NGOs.
- Simplified Processes – Use online tracking systems and faster clearances.
- Capacity Building – Train smaller NGOs in compliance and financial reporting.
- Promote Domestic Philanthropy – Strengthen CSR, social impact bonds, and local donations.
- Stakeholder Consultation – Regular dialogue between government, NGOs, and donors to build trust.
- Differentiated Regulation – Stricter norms for advocacy NGOs, simplified norms for service delivery NGOs.
The MHA directive aims at ensuring timely scrutiny and safeguarding national interests, but excessive compliance burdens risk weakening India’s vibrant civil society. A calibrated approach that balances national security with democratic space for NGOs is essential to preserve their role as partners in inclusive development.
| PYQ REFERENCE [2015] Q. Examine critically the recent changes in the rules governing foreign funding of NGOs under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 1976. [10 Marks] |
2. “As the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) marks a century of its establishment, it discusses its role in strengthening meritocracy, fairness, and integrity in governance. In the light of contemporary challenges, examine the reforms needed to ensure that the UPSC remains relevant in the 21st century.”
| Syllabus: General Studies – II: Appointment to various Constitutional Posts, Powers, Functions and Responsibilities of various Constitutional Bodies. |
The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), established in 1926 as the Public Service Commission, is celebrating its centenary in 2026. Over the decades, it has emerged as the guardian of meritocracy in India, ensuring impartial and transparent recruitment to the higher civil services. Its credibility rests on the principles of trust, fairness, and integrity, making it one of India’s most respected constitutional bodies.
Role of UPSC in Strengthening Governance
- Merit-based Recruitment – Provides equal opportunity irrespective of caste, gender, region, or socio-economic background.
- Fairness & Impartiality – Examinations conducted in 22 languages and multiple subjects ensure inclusivity.
- Integrity in Process – Confidentiality, secure evaluation, and protection from political interference safeguard its credibility.
- Level Playing Field – Aspirants from rural, underprivileged, and remote regions have entered civil services on merit.
- Nation-Building Contribution – UPSC recruits civil servants who have managed crises, implemented reforms, and driven welfare and infrastructure policies.
- Symbol of Trust – Millions of aspirants see it as a transparent institution, reinforcing faith in democratic governance.
Contemporary Challenges
- Scale and Complexity – Nearly 10–12 lakh applicants annually, across 2,500+ centres, pose logistical challenges.
- Changing Governance Needs – New demands in areas like cyber security, AI, climate change, and global diplomacy require new skill sets.
- Equity Issues – Candidates from disadvantaged backgrounds still face unequal access to resources and coaching.
- Criticism of Examination Pattern – Debate on whether the exam tests true administrative aptitude or rote learning.
- Technology Risks – Threats like impersonation, online malpractice, and data leaks.
- Global Competition – Governance today demands more domain specialists alongside generalists.
Reforms and Way Forward
- Digital Transformation – Use of AI, facial recognition, and blockchain for secure, transparent processes.
- Curriculum Modernisation – Greater focus on emerging domains like data governance, AI ethics, environment, and global trade.
- Balancing Generalists & Specialists – Introduce recruitment for niche services while preserving generalist administrators.
- Equity Measures – Expand regional exam centres, improve outreach in rural areas, and provide digital study resources.
- PRATIBHA Setu Initiative Expansion – Broaden opportunities for aspirants who reach interview stage but don’t clear final list.
- Continuous Stakeholder Feedback – Periodic review of exam process with academia, civil society, and administrators.
- Strengthening Integrity – Zero-tolerance towards malpractice, ensuring confidentiality and political neutrality.
The UPSC is not just a recruitment body; it is a pillar of India’s democratic meritocracy. As it enters its second century, the challenge is to balance tradition with innovation—maintaining fairness and trust while adapting to evolving governance needs. With thoughtful reforms, the UPSC will continue to remain the gold standard of public service recruitment in the 21st century.
| PYQ REFERENCE [2024] Q. “The duty of the Comptroller and Auditor General is not merely to ensure the legality of expenditure but also its propriety.” Comment. [10 Marks] |