1. “A nation’s happiness lies not in what it possesses but in what it pursues.”
| Syllabus: Essay |
IN NEWS: Unpacking the global ‘happiness’ rankings
The Paradox of National Happiness
What makes a nation truly happy? Is it the wealth it owns, the growth it records, or the infrastructure it builds? Global happiness patterns reveal a striking paradox: the richest nations are not always the happiest, and nations with modest resources sometimes report deeper wellbeing. This indicates that happiness is shaped less by what a nation possesses and more by what it strives toward. Nations, like individuals, flourish when their pursuits align with meaningful purpose.
Beyond Wealth: The Purpose Principle
Philosophers from Aristotle to Gandhi have argued that lasting happiness emerges from virtuous pursuits, not material accumulation. When scaled to a national level, happiness depends on collective aspirations—pursuits of justice, fairness, dignity, peace, and harmony. A nation pursuing these values, even imperfectly, nurtures more durable happiness than one obsessed solely with economic possessions.
Lessons from the World Happiness Report
Recent World Happiness Reports show Nordic countries consistently occupying the top ranks. Despite high taxes and harsh winters, these societies pursue fairness, social trust, and equality with remarkable consistency. Meanwhile, the United States—one of the wealthiest nations—has slipped in rankings due to rising loneliness, declining trust, and deep polarisation. The contrast reinforces that national happiness is not a product of assets but of aspirations.
When Prosperity Doesn’t Equal Wellbeing
Economic possessions can create comfort, but not necessarily happiness. A society may have wealth yet suffer from emotional fragility—rising anxiety, loneliness, and fragmentation. Hyper-individualistic cultures often replace community with consumption, leaving people materially secure but emotionally unsupported. Thus, prosperity without purpose becomes a hollow vessel—shiny on the outside but empty within.
The Curious Case of “Happy but Poorer” Nations
Some nations with lower incomes report higher happiness because they enjoy strong social bonds, cultural cohesion and meaningful human connections. Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness (GNH) philosophy demonstrates that the pursuit of balance, spirituality, and environmental protection can yield wellbeing even in the absence of high GDP. Similarly, Finland’s emphasis on trust, equality, and fairness creates deep emotional security across society.
India’s Happiness Paradox: Restlessness as Growth
India, one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, paradoxically ranks low in happiness indices. But this phenomenon stems from rising aspirations rather than despair. Indians increasingly demand better governance, cleaner environments, secure cities, and fair institutions. The noise of democratic discontent—protests, debates, criticisms—is not a sign of national unhappiness but of national hunger for improvement.
India’s restlessness signals pursuit. And pursuit, not possession, is the essence of happiness.
What Pursuit-Based Nations Get Right
Pursuit-oriented societies cultivate three assets that possession-oriented societies often lack: social trust, meaningful connections, and institutional purpose.
First, social trust—the belief that fellow citizens, neighbours, and institutions act with fairness—is foundational to happiness. A country may possess high income but if people feel unsafe, distrust political systems, or fear exploitation, happiness deteriorates. Trust must be pursued through transparent governance, rule of law, accountable public systems, and justice accessible to all. The Nordic countries demonstrate how decades-long pursuit of equity and fairness built durable trust.
Second, meaningful social relationships anchor human wellbeing. Urbanisation, migration, and digitalisation often fragment these bonds. A society that consciously pursues community cohesion through public spaces, cooperative cultures, and inter-generational ties fosters collective happiness. Possessions cannot fill the void left by loneliness; only human connection can. As the world faces an epidemic of isolation—nearly one-fifth of young adults report having no one to rely on—investing in social capital becomes essential.
Third, institutional purpose matters. Nations that pursue justice, sustainability, and welfare over narrow economic gains build a deeper sense of belonging. Citizens feel valued when systems work for them—when a lost wallet is returned, when police are trusted, when public services are reliable. Purposeful institutions shape purposeful citizens. India’s ongoing reforms in welfare delivery, digital governance, and ease of services aim to strengthen this trust, though challenges remain uneven across regions.
Happiness as a Journey, Not a Destination
Even wealthy societies can feel directionless if they lack purpose. The pursuit of infinite consumption fuels ecological damage, inequality, and burnout. In contrast, nations pursuing sustainability, compassion, and fairness create deeper fulfilment. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals reflect this value—happiness emerges naturally when nations chase peace, equality, and planetary health.
The Digital Age: Possessions Without Connection
Today, digital possessions—information, entertainment, virtual experiences—often replace human relationships. Yet true happiness still rests on age-old foundations: community, empathy, belonging. Nations must therefore pursue mental health, digital wellbeing, and ethical technology. India’s initiatives—Tele-MANAS, workplace wellbeing programmes, and school counselling—are steps toward aligning growth with emotional health.
The Growth of a Nation’s Soul
A nation’s happiness is ultimately a story of its moral journey. It depends on how it treats its most vulnerable, how it resolves conflicts, how it protects nature, and how it nurtures its youth. A country may own vast resources and yet feel deeply unhappy if injustice, inequality, or mistrust dominate public life. But a nation striving to uplift all sections of society, even with limited means, builds a happier collective spirit.
India’s Path: A Nation “In Pursuit”
India’s search for clean cities, transparent systems, inclusive growth, and dignity for all indicates a society evolving toward higher goals. The country is not unhappy—it is unfinished. Its dissatisfaction is a sign of ambition, not despair.
The pursuit of better governance, better opportunities, and better lives is itself a source of hope and wellbeing.
Happiness: The Power of Pursuit
A country that only counts its possessions measures prosperity superficially. But a country that measures itself by its pursuits—compassion, justice, equality, sustainability—builds a deeper sense of national wellbeing. Possessions can be lost; purpose endures. Wealth can fluctuate; values anchor societies during storms.
A nation is truly happy when it pursues what is meaningful, humane, and just.
When it strives, reforms, debates, questions, dreams.
When it builds not only infrastructure but also trust, belonging, and dignity.In the end, happiness is not something a nation owns.
It is something it seeks every single day.
| PYQ REFERENCE(UPSC 2021) Q. “The real test of civilization is not in the census, nor the size of the cities… but the kind of man the country turns out.” |
Source:https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/unpacking-the-global-happiness-rankings/article70295706.ece
2. “Decentralisation in India is constitutionalised but not actualised.” Examine the validity of this statement with reference to fiscal, functional and administrative devolution.
| Syllabus: General Studies – II (Polity and Governance) Devolution of powers and finances up to local levels and challenges therein: |
IN NEWS: What can local bodies expect from the 16th FC?
The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments (1992) provided constitutional status to Panchayats and Municipalities, making decentralisation a formal democratic mandate. However, the practice of devolution remains uneven and incomplete, revealing a wide gap between constitutional promise and actual realisation across functional, fiscal and administrative domains.
1. Functional Devolution: Assigned on Paper, Withheld in Practice
- The 11th and 12th Schedules list 29 and 18 functions respectively, but these are illustrative, not mandatory.
- States retain discretion in assigning activity mapping, leading to highly uneven functional powers.
- In many States, key functions such as water supply, public health and local planning remain controlled by parastatals or State departments.
- As a result, local bodies continue as implementers of centrally designed schemes rather than independent planning institutions.
2. Fiscal Devolution: Duties Without Dollars
The most serious constraint lies in finances.
- Own-source revenues (property tax, advertisement tax, tolls) remain low due to State-imposed restrictions, weak capacity and political hesitancy.
- State Finance Commissions (SFCs) meant to recommend predictable transfers are irregular, underfunded and often ignored.
- Union Finance Commissions, from the 13th to the 15th, have not provided stable, formula-based shares from the divisible pool and rely on ad-hoc or conditional grants.
- This results in a persistent vertical gap between revenue powers and expenditure responsibilities, making local bodies fiscally dependent on State governments.
3. Administrative Devolution: Institutions Without Empowerment
- Local governments lack control over staff.
- Functionaries are appointed, transferred and supervised by State line departments.
- Administrative fragmentation weakens accountability, affects service delivery and dilutes autonomy.
Decentralisation in India is constitutionalised through robust legal provisions, but not actualised due to restrictive State control, weak fiscal empowerment and fragmented administrative authority. For meaningful grassroots governance, India needs mandatory activity mapping, empowered SFCs, predictable fiscal transfers and cadre reforms for local governments.
| PYQ REFERENCE (UPSC 2023) Q. “Do you think Indian federalism is being redefined, with the rise of regional political parties? Elaborate.” |